Join us at the Cambridge Brewing Company in Cambridge the Tuesday after this one, June 1st, at 6pm, for the June Boston DevOps Meetup! I’ll not be there, but Dirtnap will be hanging out near the bar with a DevOps sign, and he’ll move to a table at 6pm. As always, you can find out more here.
The last 8 or 9 years of my career have been spent managing operations groups at various organizations. I think one of the most difficult tasks for any manager is hiring the right people. Many blog posts have been written about how to hire developers and operations people, and I won’t rehash what they’ve said here, but I will add to the conversations with some of my own experiences and some of the lessons I’ve learned from my mistakes.
I’ve mostly hired “DevOps” people
Almost all of my hires have been for teams that are either too small to have defined boundaries or for teams that have charters that involve problems that don’t fit into traditional operations roles (“System Engineer II”). I’m much more interested in building a team of people that will own problems and find solutions regardless of their job description and have therefore tried to avoid creating jobs that rely on a specific skill. I want people who will go outside their role boundaries and marshal the technical resources needed to solve a problem correctly.
I want to hire people to do people work and let computers do computer work. People are good at creative problem solving; they’re good at understanding subtlety and context and intention. Computers are very good at doing the same thing over and over again very quickly. In other words, if it can be automated, I want to hire the people who will automate it and move on to harder, more human problems. I want to hire smart people who can learn a particular tool if necessary, not hire people just because they’ve used that tool before.
That is not to say I like to hire purely creative people with no thought to their technical ability, but rather that I don’t hire based on knowledge of a specific technology. For example, I may run
postfix on my mail servers but I’d still hire someone with
sendmail experience if that candidate understood internet mail routing really well.
On the other hand, there’s a baseline level of technical ability you need to do your job well. I’m not hiring people to teach them Linux. You need to be experienced with the basics so that you can get to work building better tools and solving hard problems for the company that hired you. We’ve got work to do, after all.
I’ve made a lot of mistakes in hiring
Here are just a few of the many mistakes I’ve made, and some of the lessons I’ve learned from those mistakes:
Rushing a hire because of a current need (a specific project, a needed skill on a team, a work overload).
Your best admin is quitting work to become a piano tuner and he’s taking his storage management expertise with him. You need a replacement stat. What you should not do is rush to hire the first admin with storage experience on his or her resume, because it is inevitable that the hire will work on a diverse set of technologies in their career at your company. Spend the time to hire an admin who you’ll later think of as your best admin.
Some tips for speeding up hiring without sacrificing quality:
- Fast track your internal references, especially from your most valued employees. Smart people are friends with other smart people.
- Use phone screens to test candidates for the requisite technical ability; phone screens should have questions with specific answers on topics the candidate simply must know. You’ll weed out a lot of unqualified people in a 30 minute phone call.
- If they pass the first phone, do a 45 minute phone interview; discuss an interesting topic from their resume.
- Don’t be afraid to walk someone out early; it’ll save you time and they probably already know the interview isn’t going well.
- ITA is well known for our pre-interview programming puzzles, and there’s legitimate debate about this process, but if you don’t require a puzzle at least ask for a code sample or equivalent. Like the technical phone screen, this process can help identify candidates for in-person interviews.
Not interviewing thoroughly enough.
This is especially important in a small company where the success or failure of a hire can have a drastic effect on the health of the company. Have the candidate talk to at least 5 people, and make sure most of them are technical people. It’s also important to discuss who will talk about what in each interview before the interview. Otherwise, you’ll all talk to the candidate about the same interesting bit on his or her resume. Don’t hesitate to bring the candidate back for another round of interviews if you think it is warranted.
Compromising on ability.
I made this mistake at a previous job after being unable to find the correct person for the job for months. I eventually hired a person simply to get a body in, and I knew the person wasn’t good enough for the job. Sure enough we had to part ways after a few months. Firing someone is expensive and time consuming, and you’re left back where you started. Part of the problem with this hire was that my budget wasn’t correct for the skill set I wanted, but in the end it was me compromising that led to the failure.
Some lessons from this mistake:
- Fight for the correct budget for the skills you need.
- Make sure everyone agrees the person is correct for the job.
- If you haven’t hired for a position you’ve had open for a long time, perhaps you need to re-evaluate what you are looking for and if you really need the hire.
Thinking I’ll have the time to train someone in skills fundamental to the job.
I feel worst about this mistake because I should have known better; I was already overloaded at work, so what made me think I could train someone in my zero free time? Even if you think you have the free time it is inevitable that work will take back that free time.
What didn’t work for me may work for you…
… but it also may not, so be careful. Hopefully you’ll learn from my mistakes in any future hiring you do.
When I’m not playing with computers I spend a lot of time trying to play guitar, and one aspect of my musical education I have struggled with is training my ear. My guitar teacher suggested practicing with Ear Trainer, a free site that is very complete but has a terrible user interface.
In what was a very productive session of procrastinating on doing my guitar homework I ended up making my own ear training site. So, if you’re in need of some ear training, please take a look at Minor Seventh.
I’d love some feedback on the site if you end up using it. Upcoming features include:
- Listening mode, where pressing the interval buttons plays the interval
- Chord sound training
- The option to change the root note to a random note
- The option to play only the arpeggio, not the chord
- New samples
- Progression training (identify a set of chords by location in the key)
Big thanks to Jessica McKellar, Mike Fisher, Greg Price, Todd MacGarvey, Giles Hall, and the others who helped work out all the bugs. Would you like a new feature or a change? Post a comment here or send some feedback from the ‘Submit Feedback’ link on Minor Seventh!